AI-generated images are trendy but not real.

Image Credit: My Modern Met Nowadays, generative AI is a topic that is constantly being hyped by businesses everywhere you go. Companies like Shutterstock and Adobe believe that more people would be interested in using an AI image generator when grabbing a stock image than the people at Snapchat and Discord, who are busy integrating OpenAI's ChatGPT into their systems. Getty Images, however, has some rather unfavorable opinions about AI. AI image generators are still an intriguing piece of technology, particularly when used for enjoyment rather than financial gain. You might be curious to find out what all the fuss is about, or you might simply want to make something cool or new. Leaving aside the question of whether AI-generated images are actually "art," the best system-produced images are more than just ways to produce bizarre nightmare representations of famous people in different art forms. At the same time, it is insufficient for the digital artist to merely offer a hazy, impressionistic "interpretation" of the users' initial images or prompts. Even those who are completely untrained in the fine arts of painting with a brush on canvas can comprehend the middle ground amid all this clash between technology and art. AI image generators can inspire and captivate us with their creations. When creating images, some systems, like ArtBreeder's "collager" model, encourage users to be a little more inventive by repurposing existing shapes and images. But the quality of those images is very below standard. Additionally, there are other systems like MyHeritage's AI Time Machine that are cool, but they do not like it when you upload dog pictures. More significantly, to sign up for a free trial, you must pay with a credit card. Finally, we can conclude that AI-generated images are very intriguing in nature, and cannot produce real art, but they are very trendy. Some sort of experiment and research on that AI-generated software can make it superior, hope so. Although AI-generated images are good enough, we think they cannot produce a real image like an artist do. AI models can look good, but the best art can only be done by a human artist. There is no certainty, we think.