Samsung’s next flagship phone is Galaxy S23, as-yet-unannounced, maybe the only one to use Qualcomm chips. As a result, almost a quarter of the global market gets Samsung Exynos chips instead of the Qualcomm chips found in most Galaxy S22s. As soon as we learned next year’s phone would be an exclusive Qualcomm model, we reacted positively. It might seem counterintuitive to do this.
Apple makes its Bionic chips for the Apple iPhone, and it also makes desktop-grade processors for Mac computers. What makes Apple and its iPhone chips so positive but Samsung and its Exynos chips so negative? Everything about Apple’s phones is under its control, inside and out.
Samsung doesn’t make Android.
As a result, Samsung will not be able to create the operating system that will run on its Exynos chips. On the other hand, apple can streamline the next A16 chip to make it work perfectly with iOS 16. It is impossible to separate the team designing iOS from the team developing the A16 intellectually. As a result, this synergy has proven to work well. Moreover, Samsung intelligent things announced innovative home device plans.
Apple doesn’t make Apple chips.
It’s important to know who makes the chips. Samsung Galaxy S22 and Apple iPhone 13 require cutting-edge, compact processors produced by a few chip manufacturing plants, known as foundries. Only two companies can handle the task: TSMC and Samsung’s Semiconductor division. As of now, TSMC is the company that produces the Bionic chip designed by Apple. However, there are plenty of Apple iPhone components made by Samsung, the company’s biggest competitor.
They both manufacture Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 chips, such as the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 found in the Samsung Galaxy S22. However, while Samsung Semiconductor bears the Samsung name, it operates as a separate organization. Due to Semiconductor’s ability to sell chips to Samsung’s competitors, there is a legal business firewall separating Samsung Semiconductor from Samsung Electronics. Check more details about iPhone 14 Pro Max Vs Galaxy S22.
The difference has been easily negligible, and Exynos has taken all advantages. Still, without the tightest fusing between the chip designers and the operating system.